Skip to content

Conversation

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor

@mboersma mboersma commented Sep 5, 2025

What type of PR is this?

/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:

Updates the weekly security scan GH action to target the currently supported branches.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Refs #5798

Special notes for your reviewer:

TODOs:

  • squashed commits
  • includes documentation
  • adds unit tests
  • cherry-pick candidate

Release note:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Sep 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Sep 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Sep 5, 2025
@mboersma mboersma requested a review from willie-yao September 5, 2025 19:33
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 46.94%. Comparing base (59de8c1) to head (53afe96).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #5859   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   46.93%   46.94%           
=======================================
  Files         279      279           
  Lines       29687    29687           
=======================================
+ Hits        13934    13936    +2     
+ Misses      14940    14938    -2     
  Partials      813      813           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@alimaazamat
Copy link
Contributor

/approve /lgtm

Copy link
Contributor

@marosset marosset left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM label has been added.

Git tree hash: f40baf3373bf6faf3512c44375ab9aed4ce3c04a

@mboersma
Copy link
Contributor Author

mboersma commented Sep 5, 2025

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alimaazamat, marosset, mboersma

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 5, 2025
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit fc90c30 into kubernetes-sigs:main Sep 5, 2025
18 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Todo to Done in CAPZ Planning Sep 5, 2025
@mboersma mboersma deleted the update-security-branches branch September 5, 2025 22:34
@nojnhuh nojnhuh added this to the v1.22 milestone Sep 26, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

Status: Done

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants